| 1 |
|
12/29/2021 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Info Requested |
|
| 2 |
|
2/8/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
In Review |
Recv'd Civil Site Plans and Storm Report 02/04/22. Routing Concurrent review of SPR and Civil Plans |
| 3 |
|
2/16/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Info Requested |
Good Morning,
Just a quick reminder that the Public Works Plan Review Fees associated with PROJECT JUSTIFY and the WALN Public Construction projects are still outstanding. City Staff are currently devoting valuable time and effort in reviewing the documents as they are submitted for these high priority projects, and to date, there have been no delays in our review process while the Plan Review Fees are still outstanding.
At our earliest convenience, please pay the following Plan Review Fees due for the following permits:
City Permit No. 21-123522-CO MCCC Site E (Project Justify Civil Site Work, Public Construction, Final Plat)
Plan Review Fees Due: $277,070.00
City Permit No. 22-101440-PC MCCC Site F (WALN Public Construction Plan Review)
Plan Review Fees Due: $15,005.00
https://egov.cityofsalem.net/PACPortal
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Curt Pellatz |
| 4 |
|
3/1/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Info Requested |
From: Curtis Pellatz <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:13 AM
To: Jake Kurth <[email protected]>; Steve Ward, P.E. ([email protected]) <[email protected]>
Cc: Tory Banford <[email protected]>; Randy Thomas <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Project Justify and WALN Plan Review Fees 21-123522-CO
Good Morning Jake,
Just checking in on the Plan Review Fees for Project Justify. We essentially have City Staff comments ready to be released for the Civil Site Work plan set. Typically, we dont release the plan review comments without at least payment of the plan review fees.
Just let me know if there are any updates for payment.
Thanks,
-Curt | 503-588-6211 ext. 7442 |
| 5 |
|
3/14/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Info Requested |
Hi Jake,
Just checking in again on payment of the Plan Review Fees for Project Justify? As mentioned, we have plan review comments on the Civil Site Work plans ready to be provided, but are holding them until we receive payment of the fees.
Thank you,
-Curt | 503-588-6211 ext. 7442 |
| 6 |
|
3/21/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Revisions Requested |
Steve and Marcie,
We are still trying to get Scannell Properties to pay the required Plan Review Fees for PROJECT JUSTIFY. My concern is that you both have been working on revised designs even though you dont have the latest Plan Review Comments from Public Works as we wait for fee payment. I have uploaded the latest Staff comments for the Civil Site Work, Storm Report, and Public Construction Plans to the ShareFile website and send you separate links to the comments.
Some of the comments may be outdate due to the recent meetings and conversations that have occurred.
It is may hope that the City will soon see payment of the Plan Review Fees as Staff has invested a lot of time and effort to this point. At the same time, I would like to see the project continue to go forward. I hope this helps.
After downloading the files, please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Curt Pellatz
Senior Program Manager |
| 7 |
|
4/25/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Revisions Received |
Revisions recv'd and routed for review |
| 8 |
|
5/18/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Revisions Requested |
PRC3 routed to Project Engineer through ShareFile. |
| 9 |
|
6/16/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Revisions Received |
Recv'd Revised Civil Site Work and Storm Report. |
| 10 |
|
7/15/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Revisions Requested |
PRC4 To Engineer |
| 11 |
|
8/2/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Revisions Received |
Recv'd Revised Civil Site Work and Storm Report for the On-Site Improvements, DOLLAR GENERAL (fka Project Justify |
| 12 |
|
8/15/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Revisions Requested |
PRC5 Plan Review Comments routed to Project Engineer.
Marcie and Steve,
We have posted Plan Review Comments (PRC5) for the above-mentioned project to the ShareFile website. There will be two files with comments to download (Civil Plans and Storm Report). Please follow this link to access the files:
https://cityofsalem.sharefile.com/home/shared/fo164dee-c45a-4f9c-a03b-b03ae8efc3bd
On Sheet C-102, you will see comments related to the proposed driveway approach. Please note that the 50-foot wide approach exceeds the maximum allowable by Code (SCR 804.050). The maximum driveway width is 40-feet. I believe that you will need to get an Adjustment approval through Planning to exceed the maximum driveway width.
Ive also made comment, that the commercial driveway approach per PWDS Detail 315, is a possible solution. However, we would need to see curb return details/design and coordination with Steves public construction plans.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Curt Pellatz
Senior Program Manager |
| 13 |
|
8/30/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Revisions Received |
Recv'd Revised Civil Site Work plans from Elan Design. Routed for Review. |
| 14 |
|
10/20/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Info Requested |
Plan can be approved. Waiting on Site Distance Analysis for proposed driveway approach to Logistics. |
| 15 |
|
10/27/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Info Received |
Recv'd Site Distance Analysis for driveway approach on Logistics. Routed to Kevin Hottmann and Aaron Panko. |
| 16 |
|
12/4/2022 |
Curtis Pellatz
|
Approved |
|